The bulk of As You Like It takes place in the forest of Arden, a space in which
lionesses, snakes, sheep, shepherds, and those banished from court coexist and the
“lazy foot of time” is only tracked by the sighs and groans of the lover (III.II.209).
Within this space and state of relative
timelessness, the breakdown of patriarchal order, which I discussed previously
as beginning in the first act of the play, fully commences.
Within this new societal order,
class conventions fade. The clown and banished princess verbally spar with a
familiarity suggesting they are on the same level. Adam, the servant of
Orlando, is invited to dine at the same table as the wronged duke. Oliver, the
former merciless enforcer of his own patriarchal power decides to merry a woman
he believes to be a shepherdess and bestow all of his riches onto his youngest
brother, abandoning the laws of primogeniture to which he held fast within the
court. One could go on and on.
Traditional gender roles and
notions of sexual desire become equally muddled. Rosalind’s performance as
Ganymede and the ensuing relationships with both Phoebe and Orlando legitimizes
same sex desire on some level. Moreover,
all of the women of the story seem to be in full control of their romantic
destinies. As Phoebe steadfastly refuses Silvius and pursues Ganymede, no
father is consulted. Audrey is similar fatherless as she is wooed by
Touchstone. These women seem to be making their own choices rather than being
traded by the men in their lives, their futures dictated by custom. Ganymede’s
role in resolving all the entangled love triangles to his/her own benefit and
self-proclaimed status as a magician makes him/her the most cunning, and
arguably the most powerful, individual in the play despite the fact her often
referenced inherent femininity.
Nevertheless, the final act of the
play is, in many respects, a restoration of the order that is all but lost in
the forest. After the appearance of the nameless second brother, the rightful
and now restored duke proclaims that all “That have endured shrewd days and
nights with us/ Shall share the good of our returned fortune/ According to the
measure of their states,” effectively announcing the class fluidity which has flourished
in the forest will come to an end as everyone returns to the court and is given
their rightful estates (V.IV.179-81). Rosalind’s restoration of order
essentially rests on the impossibility of homosexual desire, as the stubborn
Phoebe is left with the choice to marry a woman or Silvius, which Rosalind’s
confidence in her scheme suggests is a non-choice. As the weddings take place, Rosalind asks her
father for permission to marry Orlando, her elaborate scheme to wed the man of
her dreams becoming contingent on her father’s consent, while Phoebe becomes
completely voiceless. Convention is restored, but not completely.
Primogeniture is only partially
vindicated as the forest society prepares to transition back to the court. While
the wronged duke is restored and Oliver retains his rightful lands, Orlando
does one up his eldest brother by becoming the heir to the duke’s kingdom. This
status would never be attainable by a youngest son in traditional patriarchal
society. Whether or not this violation of tradition is progressive is debatable.
In one sense, the overturn of patriarchal convention does survive outside the
formless space that is the forest. On the other hand, the fact that the strongest,
most courageous man attains the highest status in the court also characterizes
the patriarchal system as malleable, and able to account for nature. The stakes
of this should not be underestimated, just as the transgressive nature of the
play should not be discounted because of the somewhat normalizing ended, which
very well could have been an absolute necessity for an artist of Shakespeare’s
era.
Works Cited
WS Shakespeare, William. As You like It;. New York. Folger Shakespeare Library. 2009.
Print.
2 comments:
Insightful post. In particular, the forth paragraph. I also agree that the final act "restored conventions..." well like you stated, not completely. My question is, are there any other examples in the play that full convention was not restored?
I agree that because of Shakespeare's era, all of the conventions must be restored by the end of the play. As we discussed in class on Monday, art and/or performance may have been the only "safe" place to provoke such unconventional ideas regarding sexuality, gender, marriage, and class. In order to maintain a sort of normalcy, the play ends in a conventional fashion, thus protecting it from being too provocative for the time.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.